Product EMC pre-compliance is widely used to reduce the risk of failing compliance tests. Especially when a product fails the EMC compliance test in a standard laboratory, rectifying the product and resubmitting it for testing until it finally passes compliance testing can become a nightmare for company engineers.
When a person gets sick, they see a doctor. However, when a product exceeds interference limits, it is difficult to find a "doctor" for the product. If the company's product rectification is urgent and budget is not an issue, a third party can be commissioned to handle the rectification. However, after adding numerous inductors or shielding measures and eventually passing the EMC test, you might find that the rectified sample is not suitable for large-scale production or its reliability has decreased. In reality, the best "doctor" for product EMC rectification is the company's own engineers. They understand the product design and can balance production costs, manufacturing processes, and reliability in the EMC rectification plan. Pre-compliance EMC for manufacturing involves the company's engineers leading the product rectification to achieve solutions that pass the EMC test without significantly increasing costs and are easy to manufacture.
The cloud-based Minilab boon for company engineers dedicated to solving product EMC issues themselves, serving as a powerful tool for pre-compliance EMC for manufacturing. The " Minilab Testing" feature is used to perform preliminary EMC testing on the product at the production site and to evaluate the effectiveness of each rectification. The " Minilab Guide" feature helps locate the sources of electromagnetic interference in the product, enabling targeted rectification of the interference sources and avoiding the trial-and-error maze of traditional rectification methods.
Minilab, as a new pre-compliance EMC tool for manufacturing, has unique application methods and guidelines:
The following Case Study 1 will demonstrate how to find a "suitable EMC testing environment" within a company.
The following Case Study 2 will demonstrate how to use the Minilab testing system to quickly find a "suitable rectification solution."
The following Case Study 3 will demonstrate how to conduct EMC testing on-site at a company using a miniature shielded room (TEM cell).
For products with large-area PCB layouts, we will introduce the use of the MINILAB Navigation system in subsequent case studies.
Finding the right EMC pre-compliance program - trial and error method Read More...
Radiated EMC pre-compliance program - TEM method Read More...
Find a suitable EMC test environment Read More...
Principle of Cloud Computing Assisted EMC Compliance:
If a new product's test results from a standard EMC laboratory indicate that the product (EUT) exceeds EMI limits at a specific frequency, causing the product to fail EMC compliance.
Product (EUT) requiring re-engineering
Take a photo of the control circuit board and upload it to the cloud to establish the product's "virtual workspace." Mark several test points (yellow dots) on the virtual workspace and use an oscilloscope to test the voltage waveforms at these points.
Use cloud computing to analyze the data from all test points on the virtual workspace to assess the level of interference.
All test points are shown in red (the redder the color, the more severe the interference), similar to a positive nucleic acid test, indicating severe interference. Additionally, all the test points are on the 12V power line of the switching power supply and have a consistent color, suggesting that the interference is unlikely to come from an integrated circuit near any particular test point. It is very likely caused by the 12V output voltage of the switching power supply. Moreover, from the conducted interference measurement results of the EUT:
The marked portions of the spectrum are concentrated in the 150KHz-800KHz range, indicating broadband interference. The large difference between peak and average values suggests that the interference is related to the diode rectification mechanism. Therefore, the diagnosis is as follows:Diagnosis: The output of the switching power supply on the circuit board contains significant broadband noise.Solutions are as follows:Option 1: Adjust the design of the switching power supply.Option 2: Add a filter circuit at the power input.Compared to Option 2, Option 1 increases the per-unit product cost less and reduces the potential for causing radiated interference.